NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 78205 versus 75705
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 versus 17.789
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 versus 12980
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3356
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 versus 12980
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 27 June 2017 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78205 versus 75705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 versus 17.789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 versus 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 versus 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1382 MHz versus 885 MHz
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1600 MHz versus 1185 MHz
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2304
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13327 versus 11744
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 versus 483
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.25 versus 168.08
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3611.018 versus 1935.102
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 181.113 versus 111.023
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1373.944 versus 1001.496
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7074 versus 6839
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1382 MHz versus 885 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1600 MHz versus 1185 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13327 versus 11744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 versus 483 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.25 versus 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3611.018 versus 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 181.113 versus 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1373.944 versus 1001.496 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7074 versus 6839 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11744 | 13327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78205 | 75705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 190.25 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 3611.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 17.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 181.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1373.944 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 12980 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 | 7074 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 178 | 198 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $999.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1185 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 885 MHz | 1382 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 13,107 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 409.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
