NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 819 versus 406
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 versus 73.167
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 1253.829
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 16337
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 16337
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 versus 21 June 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 versus 406 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 versus 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 16337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2304
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 versus 16142
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 177023 versus 87885
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 251.703
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 3742.063
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 27.153
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 versus 16142 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 177023 versus 87885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 251.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 3742.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 27.153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3350 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16142 | 16235 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 406 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87885 | 177023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 500.053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 7209.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 41.826 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 73.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 1253.829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 16337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8850 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 146 | 143 |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1312 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc A730M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
