NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 28% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2304
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 versus 251.703
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 versus 153.341
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 3350
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 versus 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 versus 153.341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 92% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16151 versus 13084
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 versus 529
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87863 versus 83908
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 versus 3676.805
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 versus 22.75
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 1116.69
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 19139
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 19139
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8850 versus 7823
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 12000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16151 versus 13084 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 versus 529 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87863 versus 83908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 versus 3676.805 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 versus 22.75 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 1116.69 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 19139 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8850 versus 7823 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13084 | 16151 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83908 | 87863 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 153.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1304.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7823 | 8850 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104B | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 146 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1095 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |