NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2304
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 325.878 versus 251.703
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 versus 3350
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 17 October 2018 |
Pipelines | 3840 versus 2304 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 versus 251.703 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 817 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1282 MHz
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16147 versus 13352
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 820 versus 591
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87875 versus 78870
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 versus 3461.767
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 versus 26.167
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 versus 152.172
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 979.608
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 21278
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 21278
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8850 versus 8230
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 817 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1282 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16147 versus 13352 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 versus 591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87875 versus 78870 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 versus 3461.767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 versus 26.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 versus 152.172 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 979.608 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 21278 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8850 versus 8230 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13352 | 16147 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 591 | 820 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78870 | 87875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 325.878 | 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3461.767 | 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.167 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 152.172 | 153.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 979.608 | 1304.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8230 | 8850 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 17 October 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 143 | 145 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 817 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |