NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 versus NVIDIA TITAN V
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA TITAN V pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 versus 3583.136
- 7.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 versus 20.669
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 15401
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 15401
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 versus 7 December 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1700 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 versus 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 versus 20.669 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN V
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2304
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19673 versus 16112
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 919 versus 819
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 155548 versus 88096
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 270.561 versus 251.703
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 30.857 versus 27.153
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1504.373 versus 1304.365
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 versus 3350
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 versus 3350
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3565 versus 1569
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19673 versus 16112 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 919 versus 819 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155548 versus 88096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.561 versus 251.703 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 30.857 versus 27.153 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1504.373 versus 1304.365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 versus 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3565 versus 1569 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN V
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | 19673 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | 919 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 155548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 270.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 3583.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 30.857 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 20.669 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 1504.373 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 15401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 4193 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 3565 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA TITAN V | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 | 7 December 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $2,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 151 | 157 |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,899 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 3072 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 652.8 GB / s | |

