NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 23659
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3718
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3358
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 23659
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3718
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21783 versus 18814
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 versus 912
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 102535
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 326.494
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5461.22 versus 3938.377
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.133 versus 31.684
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 versus 159.275
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1506.874
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14606 versus 10966
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21783 versus 18814 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 versus 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 versus 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 versus 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1506.874 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14606 versus 10966 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18814 | 21783 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | 138583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 5461.22 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 | 14606 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 98 | 83 |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | $1,279.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | 17.22 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |