NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 43% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 versus 861
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 21578
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3652
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3290
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 21578
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3652
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 versus 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19305 versus 18762
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 147323 versus 104551
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 326.494
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 3938.377
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 31.684
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 159.275
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1506.874
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19305 versus 18762 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 147323 versus 104551 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1506.874 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18762 | 19305 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 | 861 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 104551 | 147323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10913 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $9,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 99 | 101 |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |