NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD FirePro D500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD FirePro D500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 94% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 725 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 69.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 1536
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 37% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 274 Watt
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 3 GB
- 6.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 17885
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 49.776
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1063.081
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 4.568
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 65.789
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 6020
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3685
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 6020
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3685
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 18 January 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4864 versus 1536 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 274 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 3 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 17885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 49.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1063.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 4.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 65.789 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro D500
- 2.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD FirePro D500
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD FirePro D500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 17885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 49.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1063.081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 4.568 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 65.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 6020 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD FirePro D500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GA104 | Tahiti |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 January 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 668 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 69.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 274 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 4,313 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,227 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 279 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 243.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 5080 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
