NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA Tesla P40
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla P40 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1303 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 367.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 27% de pipelines plus haut: 4864 versus 3840
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 12267
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 439
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 62287
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 300.355
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 3559.383
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 19.757
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 1214.142
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 9538
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3340
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 9538
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3340
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 13 September 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1303 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 367.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 3840 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3340 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P40
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- 5.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 204.32 versus 150.943
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 204.32 versus 150.943 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla P40 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 12267 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 439 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 62287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 300.355 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3559.383 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 19.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 204.32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1214.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 9538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla P40 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 13 September 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $5,699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 234 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1303 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 367.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 11,800 million |
Performance á point flottant | 11,758 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 10008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |