NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 10616
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 592
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 61276
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 127.622
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 3026.812
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 18.798
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 119.936
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 910.721
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 1781
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 13 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 5.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 13 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 270 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 10000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |