NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 5888
- Environ 91% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 220 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 184.548
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 5888 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 184.548 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 versus 371.785
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 3552.807
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.794 versus 31.212
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1634.218 versus 1422.602
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 26295
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 9367
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 8604
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 26295
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 9367
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 8604
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 versus 371.785 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.794 versus 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1634.218 versus 1422.602 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 9367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 8604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 26295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 9367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 8604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 31930 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22409 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 124849 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13614 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 92 | 41 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Longeur | 242 mm, 9.5 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |