NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Environ 57% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 532.8 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 10240 versus 6144
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 27212 versus 23670
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1091 versus 1053
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 versus 138730
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 versus 342.287
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 versus 42.369
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 versus 1807.647
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 versus 31420
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 versus 31420
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19752 versus 14960
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 versus 6144 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27212 versus 23670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 versus 1053 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 versus 138730 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 versus 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 versus 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 versus 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 versus 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 versus 31420 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 versus 14960 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 21% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 290 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 versus 129.036
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3359
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 versus 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27212 | 23670 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 | 1053 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 138730 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8004 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19752 | 14960 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1199 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 49 | 56 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10240 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 532.8 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 290 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 912.4 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |