NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Etwa 57% höhere Texturfüllrate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
- Etwa 67% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10240 vs 6144
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27218 vs 23668
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1091 vs 1053
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 138741
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 714.26 vs 342.287
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.192 vs 42.369
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2585.274 vs 1807.647
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 31420
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 31420
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19748 vs 14955
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 vs 6144 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27218 vs 23668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 vs 1053 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 138741 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 vs 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 vs 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 vs 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 31420 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19748 vs 14955 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Etwa 15% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 21% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 290 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 vs 129.036
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3718
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3359
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3718
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3359
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 290 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 vs 129.036 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3359 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27218 | 23668 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1091 | 1053 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 138741 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 714.26 | 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.192 | 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2585.274 | 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8004 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19748 | 14955 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1199 | $599 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 49 | 56 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 290 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 912.4 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |