NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% höhere Texturfüllrate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 18% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10240 vs 8704
- Um etwa 20% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 12 GB vs 10 GB
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 27118 vs 25228
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 1040
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 167014
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 497.768 vs 457.414
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.265 vs 51.221
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 34537
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 34537
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19794 vs 17755
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 465.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 vs 8704 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 12 GB vs 10 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27118 vs 25228 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 1040 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 vs 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 vs 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 vs 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19794 vs 17755 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1440 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 9% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 320 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 9.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 661.977
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 128.381
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1440 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 320 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 128.381 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 27118 | 25228 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 | 1040 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 | 167014 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 497.768 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.265 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 128.381 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2390.028 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19794 | 17755 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1199 | $699 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 57 | 55 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 34.10 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 186.5 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 320 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | 40 mm, 1.6 inches |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | 700 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 12 GB | 10 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 912.4 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |