NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 70 Watt versus 170 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1110 versus 971
- 3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5815 versus 1961
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 240.964 versus 188.944
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 Nov 2021 versus 12 Jan 2021 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt versus 170 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 versus 971 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 versus 1961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 versus 188.944 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1320 MHz versus 562 MHz
- Environ 48% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 59% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 199.0 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 8% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 3328
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 versus 13725
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 versus 72896
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 299.369 versus 207.704
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4021.382 versus 3385.355
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 28.778 versus 22.913
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1152.664 versus 1030.098
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz versus 562 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 3328 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 versus 13725 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 versus 72896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 versus 207.704 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 versus 3385.355 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 versus 22.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 versus 1030.098 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1110 | 971 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13725 | 17107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 72896 | 88251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5815 | 1961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.704 | 299.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3385.355 | 4021.382 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.913 | 28.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 240.964 | 188.944 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1030.098 | 1152.664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA106 | GA106 |
| Date de sortie | 23 Nov 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 114 | 134 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 562 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 3584 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 57.60 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 13250 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 167 mm, 6.6 inches | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 250 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 192 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 12 GB vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
