NVIDIA Quadro 7000 versus AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro 7000 and AMD Radeon HD 6950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 7000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 204 Watt versus 500 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 3404 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3505 versus 2613
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.699 versus 16.999
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1142.156 versus 899.056
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.796 versus 1.659
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.693 versus 49.698
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 2523
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 2523
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 May 2012 versus 14 December 2010 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt versus 500 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3404 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 versus 2613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 versus 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 versus 899.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 versus 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 versus 49.698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 2523 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6950
- Environ 69% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 70.4 GTexel / s versus 41.66 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 512
- Environ 69% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,252.8 gflops versus 1,332 gflops
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 versus 397
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 versus 110.277
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 versus 3353
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 versus 3353
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 70.4 GTexel / s versus 41.66 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,252.8 gflops versus 1,332 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 versus 397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 versus 110.277 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 7000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3505 | 2613 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 | 440 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.699 | 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1142.156 | 899.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.796 | 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.693 | 49.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 110.277 | 251.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 11657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 11657 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6105 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3652 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3652 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
Nom de code | GF110 | Cayman |
Date de sortie | 2 May 2012 | 14 December 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $14,499 | $299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 712 | 713 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 651 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,332 gflops | 2,252.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1408 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 41.66 GTexel / s | 70.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt | 500 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 248 mm | 267 mm |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 177.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3404 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |