NVIDIA Quadro K2000D versus AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and AMD Radeon HD 8750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- Environ 54% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 620 MHz
- Environ 64% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.53 GTexel / s versus 18.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 23% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 732.7 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1581 versus 988
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 versus 203
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.283 versus 8.274
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 386.006 versus 271.177
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 versus 1734
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 versus 2221
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 versus 1734
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 versus 2221
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 620 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.53 GTexel / s versus 18.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 732.7 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1581 versus 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 versus 203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 versus 8.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 versus 271.177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 versus 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 versus 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 versus 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 versus 2221 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6044 versus 3883
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.505 versus 1.018
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.834 versus 15.605
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.596 versus 31.155
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6044 versus 3883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 versus 1.018 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 versus 15.605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 versus 31.155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 versus 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 versus 3339 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1581 | 988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 203 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3883 | 6044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | 8.274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | 271.177 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | 1.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | 24.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 | 70.596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 | 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 | 1734 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 | 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GK107 | Mars |
Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 26 February 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 975 | 1280 |
Prix maintenant | $464 | |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.14 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 620 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 732.7 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.53 GTexel / s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 202 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |