NVIDIA GRID K2 versus NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID K2 and NVIDIA Quadro K2000D pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA GRID K2

versus

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K2

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 30.53 GTexel / s
8x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 384
6.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,289 gflops versus 732.7 gflops
4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2x 4 GB versus 2 GB
Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 4000 MHz
Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2737 versus 1586
2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 10550 versus 3973
Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.948 versus 14.283
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 968.568 versus 386.006
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.58 versus 1.018
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.988 versus 15.605
3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 114.144 versus 31.155
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6371 versus 2646
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6371 versus 2646

Caractéristiques
Date de sortie	11 May 2013 versus 1 March 2013
Taux de remplissage de la texture	2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 30.53 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 1536 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	2x 2,289 gflops versus 732.7 gflops
Taille de mémore maximale	2x 4 GB versus 2 GB
Vitesse de mémoire	5000 MHz versus 4000 MHz
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2737 versus 1586
Geekbench - OpenCL	10550 versus 3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.948 versus 14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	968.568 versus 386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.58 versus 1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.988 versus 15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	114.144 versus 31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6371 versus 2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6371 versus 2646

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Environ 28% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 745 MHz
4.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 51 Watt versus 225 Watt
Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 versus 319
10.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 versus 344
10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 312
10.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 versus 344
10.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 312

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	954 MHz versus 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	51 Watt versus 225 Watt
Référence
PassMark - G2D Mark	406 versus 319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3493 versus 344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3339 versus 312
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3493 versus 344
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3339 versus 312

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K2
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2737

1586

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

319

406

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10550

3973

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18.948

14.283

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

968.568

386.006

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.58

1.018

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

32.988

15.605

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

114.144

31.155

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6371

2646

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

344

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

312

3339

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6371

2646

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

344

3493

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

312

3339

Nom	NVIDIA GRID K2	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
PassMark - G3D Mark	2737	1586
PassMark - G2D Mark	319	406
Geekbench - OpenCL	10550	3973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	18.948	14.283
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	968.568	386.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.58	1.018
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	32.988	15.605
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	114.144	31.155
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6371	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	344	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	312	3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6371	2646
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	344	3493
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	312	3339

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GRID K2	NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
Essentiel
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Nom de code	GK104	GK107
Date de sortie	11 May 2013	1 March 2013
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$5,199	$599
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	976	978
Genre	Workstation	Workstation
Prix maintenant		$464
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		4.14
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	745 MHz	954 MHz
Performance á point flottant	2x 2,289 gflops	732.7 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2x 1536	384
Taux de remplissage de la texture	2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec	30.53 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	51 Watt
Compte de transistor	3,540 million	1,270 million
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	267 mm	202 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	1x 8-pin	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Mémoire
RAM maximale	2x 4 GB	2 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	2x 160.0 GB / s	64 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	2x 256 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	5000 MHz	4000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5