NVIDIA Quadro K2000D versus NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2000D and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 86% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 513 MHz
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 30.53 GTexel / s versus 22.57 GTexel / s
- Environ 9% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 352
- Environ 1% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 732.7 gflops versus 722.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 51 Watt versus 152 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 versus 391
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2646 versus 2602
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3493 versus 3104
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 versus 3316
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2646 versus 2602
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3493 versus 3104
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 versus 3316
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 versus 23 February 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 513 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.53 GTexel / s versus 22.57 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 352 |
| Performance á point flottant | 732.7 gflops versus 722.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt versus 152 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 versus 391 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 versus 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 versus 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 versus 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 versus 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 versus 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 versus 3316 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Environ 25% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 2560 MB versus 2 GB
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1958 versus 1591
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7339 versus 3971
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.451 versus 14.283
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 511.131 versus 386.006
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.925 versus 1.018
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.065 versus 15.605
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 46.591 versus 31.155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2560 MB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1958 versus 1591 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7339 versus 3971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.451 versus 14.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 511.131 versus 386.006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.925 versus 1.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.065 versus 15.605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 46.591 versus 31.155 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 1958 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 | 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3971 | 7339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.283 | 16.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 386.006 | 511.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.018 | 1.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.605 | 17.065 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.155 | 46.591 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2646 | 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3493 | 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2646 | 2602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3493 | 3104 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3316 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K2000D | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF100 |
| Date de sortie | 1 March 2013 | 23 February 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $2,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 969 | 970 |
| Prix maintenant | $464 | $268 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.14 | 12.71 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 513 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 732.7 gflops | 722.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 352 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.53 GTexel / s | 22.57 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt | 152 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 202 mm | 248 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2560 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K2000D avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7000M + nForce 610M
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
ATIRadeon Xpress 1100 IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAQuadro 5000
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 645 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAGRID K2
NVIDIAQuadro K2000D vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720A
