NVIDIA Quadro M1000M versus AMD Radeon HD 6870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD Radeon HD 6870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1072 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 151 Watt
- 4.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2879 versus 2220
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 versus 4950
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 versus 16.41
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 versus 1.344
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 21 October 2010 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 151 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2879 versus 2220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 versus 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 versus 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 versus 1.344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3349 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6870
- Environ 59% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 1120 versus 512
- Environ 98% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,017 gflops
- 512x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 407 versus 312
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 857.798 versus 721.18
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.514 versus 42.938
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.41 versus 137.786
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4238 versus 4196
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4238 versus 4196
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1120 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops versus 1,017 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 407 versus 312 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 857.798 versus 721.18 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.514 versus 42.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.41 versus 137.786 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4238 versus 4196 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4238 versus 4196 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon HD 6870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2879 | 2220 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 407 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 4950 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 16.41 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 857.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 1.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 45.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 184.41 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | 4238 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD Radeon HD 6870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GM107 | Barts |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 21 October 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $200.89 | $239 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 832 | 824 |
Prix maintenant | $203.37 | $89.99 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.10 | 38.38 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops | 2,016.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1120 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 151 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 220 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB / 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire |