NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 780 - 960 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1380 - 1485 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 versus 343
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 versus 8366
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 versus 10140
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 versus 10140
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68858 versus 68305
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 780 - 960 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1380 - 1485 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 versus 343 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 versus 8366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 versus 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 versus 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 versus 68305 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 80 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 80 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 343 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 8366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 68305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 182 | 325 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 780 - 960 MHz | 600 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 60 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 10800 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |