NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 51% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 16059
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 749
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 versus 105171
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 226.447
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 4161.764
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 25.476
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 118.544
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1106.12
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 19811
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 19811
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 16059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 versus 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 4161.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 19811 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 | 19370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 | 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 137262 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | $9,999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 154 | 103 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |