NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and AMD Radeon RX Vega pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 12297
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137748 versus 67658
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 205.049
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 4007.96
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 18.022
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1292.989
- 10.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 2094
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3652 versus 2391
- 10.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 2094
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3652 versus 2391
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 1 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 12297 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 versus 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 versus 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 versus 2391 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 882 versus 869
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8455 versus 3290
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8455 versus 3290
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 882 versus 869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.8 versus 215.219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8455 versus 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8455 versus 3290 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 12297 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 882 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 | 67658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | 205.049 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | 4007.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | 18.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | 215.8 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | 1292.989 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 8455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 2094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 2391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 8455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | AMD Radeon RX Vega | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.3 |
Nom de code | TU102 | Greenland |
Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 1 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | $599.99 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 103 | 238 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $409.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 38.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 18,600 million | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,830 gflops | |
Pipelines | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 307.2 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 512 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | HBM2 |