NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 994 versus 869
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 401.574
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19416 versus 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 994 versus 869 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 401.574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137262 versus 122349
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 4156.52
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 32.297
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 162.131
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1895.111
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 versus 122349 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 4156.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1895.111 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19416 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 994 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 122349 | 137262 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11165 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA104 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 103 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A4000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
