NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19460 versus 19278
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1004 versus 858
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 401.574
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 3290
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 21578
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3652
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19460 versus 19278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1004 versus 858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 401.574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 37% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 147346 versus 121214
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 4156.52
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 32.297
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 162.131
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1895.111
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 147346 versus 121214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 4156.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1895.111 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19460 | 19278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1004 | 858 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121214 | 147346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11043 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA104 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 104 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A4000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
IntelArc A580
