NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 26% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 4864
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1021 versus 988
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121168 versus 109075
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 323.141
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 150.943
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 1474.189
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 1 Dec 2020 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 4864 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 versus 988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 versus 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 1474.189 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Environ 92% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20419 versus 19568
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 4156.52
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 32.297
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 22050
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 22050
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2669 versus 2598
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20419 versus 19568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 32.297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2669 versus 2598 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 | 20419 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 | 988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2598 | 2669 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 103 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |