NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A4000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 18% höhere Texturfüllrate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 26% höhere Leitungssysteme: 6144 vs 4864
- Etwa 43% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1021 vs 988
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121168 vs 109075
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 323.141
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 150.943
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 1474.189
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 vs 4864 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 vs 988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 vs 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 1474.189 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Etwa 92% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20419 vs 19568
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 4156.52
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 32.297
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 22050
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 22050
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2669 vs 2598
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20419 vs 19568 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 4156.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 32.297 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2669 vs 2598 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19568 | 20419 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1021 | 988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121168 | 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2598 | 2669 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 105 | 103 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1560 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt | 200 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |