NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 290 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 47% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 342.287
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 146.214
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 1807.647
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 290 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 1807.647 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 339.8 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 versus 19545
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 versus 1026
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137664 versus 121768
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 versus 32.297
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 22050
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3355
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 22050
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3715
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3355
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3478 versus 2604
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 12 Apr 2021 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 versus 19545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 versus 1026 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137664 versus 121768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 versus 32.297 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 versus 2604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 23411 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 1051 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 137664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 42.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1807.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8004 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 3478 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 108 | 66 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 290 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A4000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIATesla T10 Processor
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
