NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 5120
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 79% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 3% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1002 versus 848
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 141.066
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 19663
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 19663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 5120 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1002 versus 848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 141.066 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Environ 54% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1132 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1628 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 16 GB
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 versus 19428
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 144084 versus 123218
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 420.465
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 versus 1895.111
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1132 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1628 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 16 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 versus 19428 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 144084 versus 123218 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 versus 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19428 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1002 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 123218 | 144084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11043 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Nom de code | GA104 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 27 March 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 103 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1696 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A4000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIARTX A4000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
