NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 433.9 GTexel/s versus 199.0 GTexel/s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 3584
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 12 GB
- Environ 7% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22836 versus 17107
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1035 versus 971
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154601 versus 88325
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 304.563
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 4024.711
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 28.79
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 187.542
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 1141.654
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 12 Jan 2021 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s versus 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 3584 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 12 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22836 versus 17107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1035 versus 971 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 versus 88325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 304.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 4024.711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 28.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 187.542 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 1141.654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 22495 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Environ 13% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1320 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1777 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 35% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 230 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22836 | 17107 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1035 | 971 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 | 88325 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 304.563 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 4024.711 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 28.79 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 187.542 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1141.654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 22495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8756 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GA106 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 126 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 13250 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 192 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
