NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Environ 28% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 433.9 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 8192 versus 6144
- Environ 26% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 290 Watt
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 68% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 155384 versus 137715
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 342.287
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 42.369
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 146.214
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 1807.647
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 6144 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 290 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155384 versus 137715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 1807.647 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23472 versus 22619
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1048 versus 1029
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 22508
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3355
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 22508
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3355
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 12 Apr 2021 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23472 versus 22619 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1048 versus 1029 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22619 | 23472 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1029 | 1048 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 155384 | 137715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8004 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3476 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 66 | 64 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 290 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |