NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 320 Watt
- 2.4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 10 GB
- Environ 68% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 457.414
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6836.931 versus 6022.79
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 versus 51.221
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 175.219
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 10 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1042 versus 1039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 versus 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 versus 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 175.219 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 1170 MHz
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 465.1 GTexel/s versus 433.9 GTexel/s
- Environ 6% de pipelines plus haut: 8704 versus 8192
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25241 versus 22844
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 166827 versus 154511
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 2038.811
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 22508
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 22508
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 1170 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s versus 433.9 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8704 versus 8192 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25241 versus 22844 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166827 versus 154511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 2038.811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 22508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22844 | 25241 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1042 | 1039 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154511 | 166827 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 457.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | 6022.79 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 51.221 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 2381.93 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 34537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17753 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA102 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 71 | 54 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 29.77 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 8704 |
Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 164.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 465.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 320 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 28300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 10 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 760.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 320 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |