NVIDIA RTX A5000 versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A5000 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1170 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1695 MHz versus 1628 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 433.9 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 60% de pipelines plus haut: 8192 versus 5120
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 230 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22847 versus 20021
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1035 versus 888
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 versus 562.775
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 versus 141.066
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 versus 1964.377
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22508 versus 19663
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22508 versus 19663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz versus 1628 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 8192 versus 5120 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22847 versus 20021 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1035 versus 888 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 versus 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 versus 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 versus 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 32 GB versus 24 GB
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 162297 versus 154601
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 24 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 162297 versus 154601 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22847 | 20021 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1035 | 888 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154601 | 162297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 27 March 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 95 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1170 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 162.7 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 433.9 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 24 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1696 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A5000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 12GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIARTX A5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
