NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 84% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s
- Environ 75% de pipelines plus haut: 10752 versus 6144
- 6x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 48 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 68% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 138728
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 342.287
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 versus 42.369
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 189.702 versus 146.214
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2347.314 versus 1807.647
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17833 versus 14960
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 339.8 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 6144 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 138728 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 versus 42.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 versus 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 versus 1807.647 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 versus 14960 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1455 MHz
- Environ 3% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 290 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 5.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23670 versus 4237
- 12.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 86
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 23142
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3712
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3353
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 23142
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3712
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3353
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 5 Oct 2020 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1455 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23670 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 23142 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 23670 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 1053 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 138728 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 42.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 1807.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 8004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 8004 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 14960 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 31 May 2021 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 56 |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 6144 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 290 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 12-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
