NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1628 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 5120
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 48 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 145794
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 562.775
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 141.066
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 1964.377
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 19663
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 19663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1628 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 5120 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 32 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1696 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 145794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 19663 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19824 versus 4237
- 9.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 848 versus 86
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19824 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 848 versus 86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 19824 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 848 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 145794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | $8,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 94 | 97 |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1696 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
