NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 23% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 versus 61276
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 versus 127.622
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 versus 18.798
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 178.784 versus 119.936
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 versus 910.721
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 versus 1781
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 versus 1781
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 13 September 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 versus 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 versus 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 versus 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 versus 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 versus 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10744 versus 4237
- 6.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 86
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 86 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 10744 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA102 | TU104 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 13 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 98 | 279 |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10752 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | None |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 10000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
