NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 ans 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 45.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 336
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 40 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16887 versus 9022
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 25.814
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 versus 623.187
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 2.063
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 30.402
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 62.233
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 3754
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 3754
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 17 May 2011 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 336 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 150 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16887 versus 9022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 25.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 versus 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 2.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3332 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
- Environ 93% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 420 MHz
- 3.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3667 versus 2173
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3667 versus 2173
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 420 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3667 versus 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3667 versus 2173 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16887 | 9022 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 25.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 623.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 2.063 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 30.402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 62.233 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3332 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 3754 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3667 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3332 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2737 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GF114 |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 17 May 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 875 | 866 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Prix maintenant | $353.59 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.61 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 45.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 1,950 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,088.6 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 99 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | Two 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2-Way | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA T400 avec des autres
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
