NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 79% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 797 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 102.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 33.184
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 3.261
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 126.579
- 43.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 117
- 20.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2173 versus 108.2
- 28x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 119.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 3.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 versus 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 119.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- Environ 84% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 420 MHz
- 4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 384
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 versus 785.059
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 versus 53.111
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 versus 5088
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 versus 2173
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 versus 3346
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 420 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 384 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 versus 785.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 versus 53.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 versus 5088 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 versus 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 versus 3346 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16887 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 1002.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 54.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 119.7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 875 | 887 |
| Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA T400 avec des autres
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 X2
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon 540
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 570X
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDROG Ally Extreme
