NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order versus AMD FirePro W9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order and AMD FirePro W9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 51% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 379.7 GTexel / s versus 163.7 GTexel / s
- Environ 36% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2816
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 12,150 gflops versus 5,238 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 750 Watt
- 2.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 11408 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 65520 versus 43046
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 146.609 versus 106.585
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 1878.403
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 9.751
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 82.208
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 511.115
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16138 versus 9143
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16138 versus 9143
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 versus 26 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s versus 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 2816 |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops versus 5,238 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 750 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 versus 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 versus 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 versus 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 versus 9143 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W9100
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 16 GB versus 12 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 versus 3714
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 versus 3355
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 versus 3714
- 9.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 versus 3355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 12 GB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 versus 3355 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 65520 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 146.609 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16138 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16138 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7987 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP102 | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 4 November 2017 | 26 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 216 | 190 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | 5,238 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 2816 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 6,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 275 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 11408 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order avec des autres
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550A
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs
NVIDIAQuadro P6000
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs
AMDRadeon VII
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
