NVIDIA Tesla P4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla P4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 600.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 27.417
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 11173
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 11173
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 versus 27 May 2016 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 27.417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 98% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 63% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- Environ 63% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 277.3 GTexel / s versus 170.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 63% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 8,873 gflops versus 5,443 gflops
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 versus 9097
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 versus 391
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 versus 37924
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 147.62
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1791.761
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 9.457
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 523.29
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s versus 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops versus 5,443 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 versus 9097 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 versus 391 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 versus 37924 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 147.62 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1791.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 9.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 523.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 versus 3341 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 | 15578 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37924 | 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla P4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 13 September 2016 | 27 May 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 349 | 281 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1063 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 170.1 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.3 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla P4 avec des autres
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
ATIFirePro V5700
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIATesla P4 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
