AMD Radeon Pro 5500M versus NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 5500M and NVIDIA Tesla P4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1063 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 124.8 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 versus 392
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1860.146 versus 1791.761
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.238 versus 9.457
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 596.819 versus 523.29
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 versus 13 September 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1063 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s versus 170.1 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 16 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 versus 392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 versus 1791.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 versus 9.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 versus 523.29 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 1536
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 85 Watt
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9065 versus 6786
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 37864 versus 37186
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 versus 105.82
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.574 versus 94.947
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 versus 9175
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 versus 3670
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 versus 9175
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 versus 3670
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 1536 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 85 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9065 versus 6786 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37864 versus 37186 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 versus 105.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 versus 94.947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 versus 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 versus 3670 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 versus 9175 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 versus 3670 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6786 | 9065 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 392 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37186 | 37864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.82 | 147.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1860.146 | 1791.761 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.238 | 9.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.947 | 99.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 596.819 | 523.29 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9175 | 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9175 | 11409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3341 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3426 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Nom de code | Navi 14 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 13 Nov 2019 | 13 September 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 353 | 354 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 24 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 810 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.994 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 41.60 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.8 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6400 million | 7,200 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,443 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |