AMD Radeon RX 590 versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1469 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 versus 590
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 137.469 versus 127.622
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 119.936
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 1781
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 versus 13 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 versus 590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 versus 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 119.936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 8000 MHz
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10744 versus 9393
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 45826
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 2083.862
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 12.352
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 762.142
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 13383
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 13383
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 versus 9393 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 45826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 13383 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9393 | 10744 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45826 | 61276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 137.469 | 127.622 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 | 3026.812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.352 | 18.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 | 119.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 762.142 | 910.721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13383 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13383 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4757 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon RX 590 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Nom de code | Polaris 30 | TU104 |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Date de sortie | 15 November 2018 | 13 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 276 | 280 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1469 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |