NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 21% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1252 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 4012 MHz
- 6.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10744 versus 1642
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 442
- 20.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 3053
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 versus 19.856
- 9.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 309.824
- 13.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 1.38
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 25.011
- 10.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 84.489
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 2709
- 5.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 2709
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 7 February 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1252 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 4012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 versus 1642 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 versus 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 2709 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 versus 1976
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 versus 1781
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 versus 1976
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 | 1642 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU104 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 279 | 1000 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $119.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops | |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 32.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 |