NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1470 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1650 MHz
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 175 Watt
- 639x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 versus 2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 2 July 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1470 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1650 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 175 Watt |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 versus 2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- Environ 55% de pipelines plus haut: 2176 versus 1408
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 versus 12712
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 versus 804
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87635 versus 62641
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 versus 187.131
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 versus 2548.187
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 versus 15.882
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 versus 117.673
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 versus 901.388
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 17812
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3717
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3351
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 17812
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3717
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3351
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2176 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 versus 12712 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 versus 804 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 versus 62641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 versus 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 versus 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 versus 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 versus 117.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 versus 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 17812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 17812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 16476 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 856 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 87635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 241.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 3870.683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 27.021 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 160.92 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1269.445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 20969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 5567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 5026 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 20969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 5567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 5026 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 2 July 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 223 | 148 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1470 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2176 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 10.8 B |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 9.0” (228.60mm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 8 pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | 2-Slot |
| Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRyzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
