AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 6.9x better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 517 vs 165
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5125 vs 2802
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 401
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1093 vs 746
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 401
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1093 vs 746
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 5 January 2012 |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 517 vs 165 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5125 vs 2802 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 vs 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 vs 746 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 125
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1763 vs 1704
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1763 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 187 vs 125 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1763 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1763 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 517 | 165 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 125 | 187 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5125 | 2802 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 1763 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 746 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 1763 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Topaz | Cedar |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 1479 | 1481 |
Price now | $799 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 650 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |