Intel HD Graphics 615 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 615 and AMD Radeon R7 M260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 25.2 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 714 vs 497
• Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 187 vs 121
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 215.572 vs 145.3
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.238 vs 0.925
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1128 vs 1093
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2409 vs 1704
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1128 vs 1093
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2409 vs 1704

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 79% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
• Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4841 vs 3054
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 12.486
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 11.311
• 4.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 18.292
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1128
• Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1128

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 615
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	714 497
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 121
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3054 4841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.486 14.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	215.572 145.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.238 0.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11.311 19.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	18.292 77.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1128 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2409 1704

Compare specifications (specs)