AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 74% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 540 MHz
- Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 506 vs 461
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 121 vs 62
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 2 February 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 540 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s vs 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 72 |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops vs 187.49 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 506 vs 461 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 121 vs 62 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 1580 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 5130
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2502 vs 1704
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2502 vs 1704
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8132 vs 5130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2502 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2502 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 506 | 461 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 121 | 62 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5130 | 8132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 2502 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 2502 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | Topaz | GT215 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 2 February 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1476 | 1477 |
| Price now | $799 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 540 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | 187.49 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 72 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | 12.96 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 727 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 175 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 25.28 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3650
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 380M
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320 OEM
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820M
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics
