AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 10.243
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 18.793
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 19.139
- 27.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 51
- 23.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1093 vs 47
- 28.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1704 vs 59.6
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 8 November 2013 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 vs 10.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 vs 18.793 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 vs 19.139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 51 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 vs 47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 vs 59.6 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 940 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 34.72 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 833.3 gflops vs 721.9 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 vs 145.3
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.966 vs 0.925
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 vs 1404
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 vs 1093
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1085 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s vs 22.56 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 833.3 gflops vs 721.9 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 vs 145.3 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 vs 0.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 502 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5123 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | 10.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | 393.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | 0.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | 18.793 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | 19.139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 3011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 2916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 51 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 59.6 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Topaz | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 1487 | 1489 |
Price now | $799 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | 833.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 80 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |