AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro W6600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 58% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1695 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
2.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3713
4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3713
12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3354
12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3354

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	8 Jun 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020
Core clock speed	2200 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	2903 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 8 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	15778 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	15778 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	42325 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	42325 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
5.9x more pipelines: 10496 vs 1792
3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 1023
Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26811 vs 15863
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 20826
Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 20826
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 188416 vs 70762

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	556.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines	10496 vs 1792
Maximum memory size	24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1051 vs 1023
PassMark - G3D Mark	26811 vs 15863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	33398 vs 20826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	33398 vs 20826
Geekbench - OpenCL	188416 vs 70762

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1023

1051

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

15863

26811

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20826

33398

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20826

33398

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15778

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15778

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42325

3354

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

42325

3354

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

70762

188416

Name	AMD Radeon Pro W6600	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark	1023	1051
PassMark - G3D Mark	15863	26811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20826	33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20826	33398
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	15778	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	15778	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	42325	3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	42325	3354
Geekbench - OpenCL	70762	188416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		732.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		63.011
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		247.569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		2441.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		19885

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro W6600	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ampere
Code name	Navi 23	GA102
Launch date	8 Jun 2021	1 Sep 2020
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	$1499
Place in performance rating	38	40
Type		Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2903 MHz	1695 MHz
Compute units	28
Core clock speed	2200 MHz	1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	650.3 GFLOPS (1:16)	556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	20.81 TFLOPS (2:1)	35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	10.40 TFLOPS	35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1792	10496
Pixel fill rate	185.8 GPixel/s	189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	325.1 GTexel/s	556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	11060 million	28300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Single-slot
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	241 mm (9.5 inches)	313 mm (12.3 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU)	300 Watt	750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 12-pin
Height		138 mm (5.4 inches)
Width		Triple-slot
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.2
OpenCL	2.1	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	936.2 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	384 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)	1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6X