AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W6600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1395 MHz
  • Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 2903 MHz vs 1695 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
  • 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 vs 3713
  • 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 vs 3713
  • 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 vs 3354
  • 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 vs 3354
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 vs 1 Sep 2020
Core clock speed 2200 MHz vs 1395 MHz
Boost clock speed 2903 MHz vs 1695 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 8 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt vs 350 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 15778 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 15778 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 42325 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 42325 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

  • Around 71% higher texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
  • 5.9x more pipelines: 10496 vs 1792
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 990 vs 915
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25975 vs 13700
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33341 vs 20826
  • Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33341 vs 20826
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 556.0 GTexel/s vs 325.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines 10496 vs 1792
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 990 vs 915
PassMark - G3D Mark 25975 vs 13700
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 33341 vs 20826
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33341 vs 20826

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
915
990
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13700
25975
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20826
33341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
20826
33341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15778
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15778
3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42325
3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
42325
3354
Name AMD Radeon Pro W6600 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark 915 990
PassMark - G3D Mark 13700 25975
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20826 33341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20826 33341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 15778 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 15778 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 42325 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 42325 3354
Geekbench - OpenCL 205239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 737.298
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 7585.258
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 66.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 309.051
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2451.491
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 19970

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
Code name Navi 23 GA102
Launch date 8 Jun 2021 1 Sep 2020
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $1499
Place in performance rating 10 5
Type Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2903 MHz 1695 MHz
Compute units 28
Core clock speed 2200 MHz 1395 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 10.40 TFLOPS 35.58 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1792 10496
Pixel fill rate 185.8 GPixel/s 189.8 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 325.1 GTexel/s 556.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 11060 million 28300 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Single-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 241 mm (9.5 inches) 313 mm (12.3 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 300 Watt 750 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 12-pin
Height 138 mm (5.4 inches)
Width Triple-slot

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.2
OpenCL 2.1 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 224 GB/s 936.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6X