AMD A10-9620P vs AMD FX-9800P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-9620P und AMD FX-9800P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-9620P
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1267 vs 1229
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 384 vs 364
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1040 vs 1013
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4373 vs 3977
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4373 vs 3977
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 January 2017 vs 1 June 2016 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1267 vs 1229 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 384 vs 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1040 vs 1013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4373 vs 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4373 vs 3977 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FX-9800P
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2562 vs 2535
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1106 vs 983
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1219 vs 887
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1106 vs 983
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1219 vs 887
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2562 vs 2535 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1106 vs 983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1219 vs 887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1106 vs 983 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1219 vs 887 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-9620P
CPU 2: AMD FX-9800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-9620P | AMD FX-9800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1267 | 1229 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2535 | 2562 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 384 | 364 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1040 | 1013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 983 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 887 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4373 | 3977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 983 | 1106 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 887 | 1219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4373 | 3977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 92.287 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 35.16 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A10-9620P | AMD FX-9800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Bristol Ridge | Bristol Ridge |
| Startdatum | 1 January 2017 | 1 June 2016 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1806 | 1774 |
| Serie | Bristol Ridge | AMD FX-Series Processors for Laptops |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | FM980PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Matrizengröße | 250 mm | 250 mm |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90 °C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 3100 Million |
| Base frequency | 2.7 GHz | |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Configurable TDP | 12-15 Watt | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 758 MHz | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A10-9620P mit anderen
AMDA10-9620P vs
AMDA8-3500M
AMDA10-9620P vs
AMDA6-4400M
AMDA10-9620P vs
AMDRyzen 5 3500U
AMDA10-9620P vs
IntelXeon E5-2448L v2
AMDA10-9620P vs
IntelCeleron G3900TE
AMDA10-9620P vs
IntelCeleron G6900TE
